While California leads the way in electric vehicles, these two states lag far behind with the lowest numbers per 100,000 residents

California is a pioneer in electric vehicles (EVs) and has set a high bar that most other states are still trying to reach. With over 1.1 million registered EVs and 3,026 EVs per 100,000 residents, California is not only leading the field, it is shaping the field.

California’s commitment to green energy is also reflected in its network of over 15,000 electric vehicle charging stations, which account for nearly 29% of all charging stations in the country.

Don’t miss:

Highest acceptance rates for electric vehicles (Electric vehicles per 100,000 people):

• California: 3,026
• Washington: 1,805
• Hawaii: 1,686
• Oregon: 1,422
• Colorado: 1,405
• Nevada: 1,379
• New Jersey: 1,349

Tendency: General Motors and other market leaders proved to be Invest in this revolutionary lithium startup – with a starting price of just $9.50 per share and a minimum investment of $1,000, it’s easy to get started.

But while California is miles ahead in the race to electrification, some states are struggling to even get off the ground. Two states, Mississippi and North Dakota, have the fewest electric vehicles per 100,000 residents, showing a stark contrast in electric vehicle adoption across the U.S.

Lowest adoption rates for electric vehicles (Electric vehicles per 100,000 people):

• Mississippi: 110
• North Dakota: 112
• West Virginia: 144
• Louisiana: 165
• South Dakota: 169
• Wyoming: 185

Tendency: Take advantage of a $400 billion opportunity by investing in the future of EV infrastructure on The value of this startup is already estimated at 50 million US dollars.

Mississippi has just 110 electric vehicles per 100,000 residents. North Dakota isn’t much better, with just 112 electric vehicles per 100,000 residents. That’s much lower than states like California, which has 3,026 electric vehicles per 100,000 residents, Washington with 1,805, and Hawaii with 1,686.

So why is there such a big difference? There are several reasons for this. A big reason is price, as electric vehicles are often more expensive than U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement vehicles. States like California have also long encouraged electric vehicle adoption by offering incentives, investing in infrastructure, and creating policies that encourage people to switch to electric cars. For example, one of the largest programs, the Clean Vehicle Rebate Project (CVRP), pays up to $12,000 when retiring an internal combustion engine vehicle and purchasing a qualifying electric vehicle.

See also: Don’t miss the real AI boom – Here’s how you can invest in high-growth private technology companies with just $10.

Lifestyle and geography also play a role. In rural states, long commutes between cities are common, so the current range of many electric vehicles may be viewed as less practical than that of traditional gasoline vehicles.

The slow growth of electric vehicle use in these states reminds us that while the nation as a whole is moving toward a greener future, the pace of change remains uneven. As the federal government pushes for wider electric vehicle adoption with programs like the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) plan, which includes billions in funding to expand electric vehicle infrastructure, there is hope that even states with low adoption rates will see an increase in electric vehicle numbers in the coming years.

Read more: