If you’ve been following soccer for a while, you’ve probably heard of Pep Guardiola. The guy is a legend. And rightly so. His positional style of play turned the sport on its head and now almost everyone tries to emulate him. But is the Spaniard’s work really unique? This is where two more names come in – one familiar to American fans, the other less so: Wilfried Nancy and Fernando Diniz. Two coaches with playing styles that at first glance seem worlds away from Pep’s, but if we dig a little deeper, they may be pursuing the same goal.
Follow MLS Multiplex on X (Twitter).
Wilfried Nancy is the coach who flies under the radar, but he really shouldn’t. Columbus Crewhe has transformed his team into a possession machine that almost floats over the field. And that is no coincidence. Nancy has developed his own philosophy that his players lovingly “Nancy Ball.” The secret of his success? Freedom within a system. He wants his players to move, create space and take control of the game. But unlike Guardiola, who works with fixed positions and an almost choreographed build-up, Nancy is more flexible. He mixes positional play concepts with a kind of fluidity that challenges his players to think and react together.
And the wild part? It works. His players feel empowered, as if they are solving puzzles on the field. It’s not just about tactics, but psychology too – he wants his athletes to feel like they can control the game, no matter who is on the other side. Ultimately, Nancy is perhaps more like Guardiola than we think. Both seek total control of the game; Nancy just does so with a looser, less rigid approach.
When we talk about Guardiola, it’s all about order. The guy is almost like a mad football scientist, constantly searching for the perfect formula to dominate the opposition. His positional play is practically a work of art – players spread out in strategic places around the field, always ready to receive the ball and always knowing exactly where their teammates are. And this doesn’t just happen by chance. Pep practices these movements over and over in training until every player knows his role inside and out. His team controls the game with patience, waiting for the perfect moment to strike – like a snake ready to pounce.
But don’t think that means his style is rigid. In fact, it’s a carefully rehearsed dance. Sure, there’s structure in terms of positioning, but at the same time, that structure allows for an almost ridiculous fluidity in passing. Guardiola has turned football into an art form, where every move is designed to wear down the opponent both physically and mentally. But what sets him apart from Wilfried Nancy and Fernando Diniz is that while Pep seeks total control from start to finish, Nancy and Diniz prefer a bit of chaos.
And then there’s Fernando Diniz, the guy whose style of play is chaos personified. But don’t get me wrong – that chaos is entirely intentional. Diniz loves to break the traditional rules of football. His teams are known for their insane movement, with every player jostling for the ball. He doesn’t want his players to stand still and wait for the ball to come to them; he wants them to move, create space, and invade spaces they shouldn’t be in. It seems disorganized, but it’s all part of the plan. The idea is to keep the opponent off balance, make them lose their bearings, and create openings.
Diniz is almost the anti-Guardiola, but with the same goal in mind: possession. He wants his teams to have the ball, but instead of playing patiently, he is aggressive, creating a frenzied pace that makes the opposition sweat. It’s as if he’s playing a chaotic version of Guardiola’s positional play, but deep down he’s striving for the same thing: total dominance of the game.
Follow MLS Multiplex on X (Twitter).
What’s really interesting is that despite their differences, Nancy, Guardiola and Diniz are all heading in the same direction. They want their teams to dominate through possession. They want their players to be comfortable with the ball at their feet. They want their teams to be the protagonists on the field. But while Guardiola does this with surgical precision, Nancy mixes a bit of chaos with control and Diniz throws himself headlong into total chaos.
What we see are three guys trying to find different ways to control the game. There is no right way to play. What matters is the result, and in that sense they are all right. Nancy’s style of play, with its flexibility, is a breath of fresh air in a world where pragmatism reigns. Guardiola continues to be the benchmark for excellence with his methodical order. And Diniz brings a unique energy that challenges the norm with his controlled chaos.
So when someone asks if Nancy, Guardiola and Diniz are similar, the answer is a big “it depends”. They are incredibly similar and yet completely different. And that is what makes them so fascinating. They are masters of their own philosophies and all aim for the same thing: to control the game.
