close
close

Opinion | Will the dissolution of Thailand’s Move Forward Party trigger a new wave of youth protests?

Opinion | Will the dissolution of Thailand’s Move Forward Party trigger a new wave of youth protests?

The relatively calm response from the country’s young people is notable for several reasons. The MFP and its former leader Pita Limjaroenrat, who led the party to victory in 2023, were particularly popular among young Thais. More importantly, the dissolution of the MFP is largely a repeat of another groundbreaking episode in Thai politics from 2020. The MFP’s predecessor, the Future Forward party, was dissolved after unexpectedly strong election results and its executive board members were banned from politics. Most of Future Forward’s MPs switched to the MFP, which continued Future Forward’s progressive policies.

Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, founder of the now-defunct Future Forward party, at an event in Bangkok in January 2021. Photo: AFP
However, a more significant consequence of the dissolution of Future Forward lies beyond party politics. Future Forward and its chairman Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit Because Future Forward was extremely popular among young people, its dissolution has often been seen as one of the triggers for the student-led pro-democracy protests in 2020. Indeed, on the night of Future Forward’s dissolution, “flash rallies” took place on several university campuses, which later expanded into large-scale protests.

So if this is indeed a repeat, should we expect another round of national protests, perhaps with similar fervor and harsh rhetoric as in 2020? That seems quite unlikely.

A comparison of the immediate reactions to the two resolutions shows that reactions this time were much more muted. Students tended to engage in symbolic actions on campus rather than street demonstrations, such as law students walking out of a Constitutional Court judge’s lectures. While several student groups announced “flash protests” on campus, such as in Thammasat, Chulalongkorn and Chiang Mai, these were much smaller than those in 2020. Even though the MFP invited supporters to its headquarters on the day of the ruling, the crowd was described as “small.” It seems that the urge to protest among young Thais has largely subsided. This can be explained by several factors.

One commonly cited reason is that the student movement was crushed by the same justice system that disbanded Future Forward and MFP. The leaders who emerged from the 2020 protests were charged, imprisoned, apparently fled the country, or tragically died in custody. Faced with such losses, the movement has struggled to maintain its momentum. It should be noted that some of the energy was already lost in 2021, when the government under Prayuth Chan-ocha responded with increasingly violent measures. After one death and permanent injuries to several protesters, the state has succeeded in deterring many people from attending rallies.

Pro-democracy protesters show the three-finger salute during an anti-government demonstration in front of Kasetsart University in 2020 and demand the resignation of Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-o-cha. Photo: dpa

Another reason could simply be that it was a “repeat episode” – a reused storyline is simply less likely to shock audiences. Although Thailand’s Constitutional Court has a habit of dissolving political parties, the dissolution of Future Forward likely came as a shock to many of its supporters. In contrast, the dissolution of MFP had already been somewhat expected following a ruling in January that said proposals to amend the lese majeste law amounted to an attempt to overthrow the monarchy. Since it was a less surprising ruling, not as many people and students were motivated to join the various protests.

Other reasons are due to the 2023 elections. Many young people were likely disillusioned with the results after the MFP failed to form a government. Another less discussed factor is that the 2020 pro-democracy coalition, which included Pheu Thai supporters, fell apart somewhat in 2023. Pheu Thai is itself a successor to two dissolved parties and issued a statement of sympathy for Future Forward in 2020. Several prominent Pheu Thai supporters were often present at the 2020 protests.

After the 2023 elections, Pheu Thai was the second largest party. However, Pheu Thai is accused of Break of the coalition with MFP to form a government with pro-establishment parties. This created an irreparable rift between the two parties’ supporters; the Pheu Thai faction of the 2020 pro-democracy protests is unlikely to turn up at rallies in support of the MFP again as their political goals have diverged. It therefore seems unlikely that the 2020 phenomenon will be repeated.

03:02

Thailand’s reformist political party Move Forward dissolved due to lese majeste law

Thailand’s reformist political party Move Forward dissolved due to lese majeste law

While the Thai establishment has arguably succeeded in breaking the youth’s motivation to take to the streets, it has failed to quell the discontent of the MFP’s 14 million voters, a significant proportion of whom are young people. Their lack of protest at present may not necessarily be a sign of apathy or fatigue – perhaps they will choose to strategically express their political frustration through the ballot box and other official channels that carry a lower risk of violence and prison sentences.

Finally, MFP’s voter base doubled after Future Forward was dissolved. A successor party, the People’s Party, has already been formed. In less than a week, it has attracted over 46,000 members and more than 23 million baht (US$635,000) in donations. It remains to be seen whether the new party can repeat MFP’s success in the next election, when even more young people will be eligible to vote.

Panarat Anamwathana is a visiting scholar at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. She is also a lecturer at the Faculty of Humanities, Thammasat University, Thailand. This article was first published on the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak commentary website. fulcrum.sg.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *